Winston Chew
← All reflections

A reflection for working parents

Raising Emotionally Steady Kids When You’re Running on Empty

Winston Chew 6 min read Parenting & relationships

It is 7:15 on a Thursday evening. We have survived three back-to-back meetings, a client escalation and the drive home. Our eight-year-old refuses to start his homework, and a spilled glass of milo becomes the last straw. We raise our voice, he bursts into tears, and a familiar question follows us to bed: What am I teaching my child?

Working parents carry two full-time roles and often a quiet fear that the second is losing to the first. The research offers something better than guilt. Emotional steadiness in children grows from three things we can still give on a tired day: a parent who notices their own depletion, a parent who repairs, and a parent who names feelings. Steady children come from honest parents, and honesty costs no energy we lack.

Parental burnout: the name for running on empty

Parental burnout is a recognised syndrome with three features: overwhelming exhaustion tied to the parenting role, emotional distancing from our children, and a sense of being ineffective as a parent (Mikolajczak et al., 2019). It emerges when the stressors of parenting persistently outweigh the resources we have to meet them — a balance Moïra Mikolajczak and Isabelle Roskam describe as risks against resources (Mikolajczak & Roskam, 2018). Burnout measures a gap between load and support, and gaps can be closed.

The condition is common and culturally shaped. A 42-country study of 17,409 parents found prevalence ranging from near zero to about 9.8 per cent, with the highest rates in individualistic cultures where parents carry the load with less communal support (Roskam et al., 2021).

The stakes for children are real. Longitudinal studies of parents in Belgium and the United Kingdom found that burnout sharply increased escape ideation, neglectful behaviour and harsh or violent responses toward children, with large effect sizes (Mikolajczak et al., 2019). Earlier work showed these child-related effects were specific to parental burnout, beyond what job burnout alone explains (Mikolajczak et al., 2018).

What would change in our home if we treated our exhaustion as data rather than as failure?

Caring for the parent is caring for the child.

Why an empty tank leaks

Stress from work travels home with us. Psychologists call it spillover, and Rena Repetti’s research at UCLA shows how it looks at the dinner table. When she tracked mothers of preschoolers day by day, heavy workloads and tense exchanges with colleagues were followed by mothers who spoke less, showed less affection and paid less attention to their children that evening — a pattern observers confirmed as well as the mothers themselves (Repetti & Wood, 1997).

The finding surprised the researchers. They expected irritability; they found withdrawal. Many of us picture the harm of a bad day as shouting, yet the more frequent cost is quieter: the phone in hand, the half-heard story, the distracted “mm-hmm.” Depletion often shows up as absence before it shows up as anger.

The same study found that mothers already carrying higher anxiety or depressive symptoms showed stronger spillover (Repetti & Wood, 1997). The tank we arrive home with shapes the parent our children meet. What we refill at work’s end, we spend at home’s beginning.

Repair matters more than perfection

The paediatrician and psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott gave tired parents a phrase worth keeping. The “good-enough” parent, he wrote, adapts actively to a child’s needs and then gradually less so, as the child grows able to tolerate frustration (Winnicott, 1953). Children need parents who are present and imperfect, in that order.

Developmental research supports him. Edward Tronick’s studies of mothers and infants showed that ordinary, healthy interaction moves constantly between moments of connection and moments of mismatch, and back again. Each time the pair repairs a mismatch, the infant learns that distress can be survived and that connection returns (Tronick, 1989).

The principle holds beyond infancy. In a study of 96 mothers and their three-year-olds, pairs repaired roughly half of their difficult moments during challenging tasks. Children whose parents repaired more often showed better emotion regulation and fewer behaviour problems later on (Kemp et al., 2016).

This changes the question we ask ourselves at bedtime. The shouted word over the spilled milo is a rupture; the return to the child’s room is a repair. “I was tired and I spoke sharply. That was mine to fix, and I’m sorry. I love you.” Every honest repair is a lesson in steadiness.

Emotion coaching: five small moves

John Gottman, Lynn Katz and Carole Hooven followed families over several years and found that parents differ in how they think and feel about emotion itself — what they called meta-emotion. Some parents dismiss a child’s sadness or anger; others treat it as a moment to coach (Gottman et al., 1996). How we feel about feelings shapes how our children handle theirs.

Emotion-coaching parents share five habits (Gottman et al., 1996):

  1. They notice emotions early, while the feeling is still small.
  2. They treat a child’s distress as an opportunity for closeness and teaching.
  3. They listen and validate what the child feels.
  4. They help the child find words for the emotion.
  5. They set limits on behaviour while solving the problem together.

In that study, children of emotion-coaching parents showed stronger physiological self-soothing, better peer relationships and higher later academic achievement (Gottman et al., 1996). The data were correlational, so a later trial matters. In a randomised controlled trial with 216 parents of four- and five-year-olds, a six-session emotion-coaching programme called Tuning in to Kids increased parents’ coaching, improved children’s emotional knowledge, and reduced behaviour problems reported by parents and teachers (Havighurst et al., 2010). Emotion coaching can be learned, and children benefit when we learn it.

None of the five moves requires a full tank. Naming a feeling takes one sentence: “You’re disappointed the game ended. That makes sense.” The smallest words often carry the steadiest lessons.

Refilling the tank: self-compassion and support

The tired parent’s inner critic sounds convincing: A better parent would not have shouted. Psychologist Kristin Neff offers a different voice. Self-compassion, as she defines it, holds three elements: kindness toward ourselves in failure, recognition that struggle is part of the shared human experience, and mindful awareness of pain without over-identifying with it (Neff, 2003). We speak to ourselves the way we hope our children will learn to speak to themselves.

The evidence is growing. A meta-analysis of 13 randomised trials found that parenting programmes including self-compassion raised parents’ self-compassion and were linked to lower parental depression, anxiety and stress; the authors note the studies were often small and the effects on children remain unclear (Jefferson et al., 2020). We hold this finding with honest proportion: promising for parents, still being tested for children.

Encouraging evidence also comes from treating burnout directly. In a trial with 142 burned-out parents, eight weekly group sessions cut burnout symptoms by 37 per cent, neglect by 35 per cent, violence by 32 per cent, and hair cortisol by 52 per cent. One group received structured skills training; the other was simply heard with warmth and empathy. Both worked equally well (Brianda et al., 2020). For a depleted parent, being heard is itself a treatment.

Who listens to us, and when did we last let them?

A practice for the tired evening

Steadiness in children grows from what we do repeatedly on ordinary days. Here are five practices that fit into a depleted evening:

  1. Check the gauge before the door. Pause in the car or the lift for one minute. Name our own state honestly: drained, tense, flat. The day’s stress tends to follow us home (Repetti & Wood, 1997); noticing it gives us a choice about what we bring in.
  2. Offer presence before productivity. Give the first ten minutes at home to connection instead of instructions. Withdrawal is the quiet cost of a hard day; a deliberate greeting counters it.
  3. Name one feeling. When a child is upset, label the emotion before solving the problem: “You’re frustrated. I get it.” (Gottman et al., 1996; Havighurst et al., 2010).
  4. Repair before bed. When we snap, return and own it. Children learn that relationships bend and hold (Tronick, 1989; Kemp et al., 2016).
  5. Refuel from someone. Tell a spouse, friend or counsellor how tired we truly are. Being heard lowers burnout (Brianda et al., 2020); burnout runs higher in cultures where parenting is carried more individually (Roskam et al., 2021).

One caution belongs here. If exhaustion, emotional distance from our children, or thoughts of escaping the parenting role persist for weeks, these are recognised signs of parental burnout (Mikolajczak et al., 2019). A counsellor, psychologist or family doctor is the right next step, and asking for that help is an act of good parenting.

Return to that Thursday evening and the spilled milo. The ideal scene never happens; the repaired one can happen every night. We sit on the edge of the bed, name what went wrong, and hold a small hand again. Children borrow steadiness from parents who are honest about running low and faithful about coming back.

Notes & sources

  1. Brianda, M. E., Roskam, I., Gross, J. J., Franssen, A., Kapala, F., Gérard, F., & Mikolajczak, M. (2020). Treating parental burnout: Impact of two treatment modalities on burnout symptoms, emotions, hair cortisol, and parental neglect and violence. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 89(5), 330–332. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506354
  2. Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.10.3.243
  3. Havighurst, S. S., Wilson, K. R., Harley, A. E., Prior, M. R., & Kehoe, C. (2010). Tuning in to Kids: Improving emotion socialization practices in parents of preschool children – Findings from a community trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(12), 1342–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02303.x
  4. Jefferson, F. A., Shires, A., & McAloon, J. (2020). Parenting self-compassion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 11(9), 2067–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01401-x
  5. Kemp, C. J., Lunkenheimer, E., Albrecht, E. C., & Chen, D. (2016). Can we fix this? Parent–child repair processes and preschoolers’ regulatory skills. Family Relations, 65(4), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12213
  6. Mikolajczak, M., Brianda, M. E., Avalosse, H., & Roskam, I. (2018). Consequences of parental burnout: Its specific effect on child neglect and violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.025
  7. Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., & Roskam, I. (2019). Parental burnout: What is it, and why does it matter? Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1319–1329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619858430
  8. Mikolajczak, M., & Roskam, I. (2018). A theoretical and clinical framework for parental burnout: The balance between risks and resources (BR²). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00886
  9. Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
  10. Repetti, R. L., & Wood, J. (1997). Effects of daily stress at work on mothers’ interactions with preschoolers. Journal of Family Psychology, 11(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.11.1.90
  11. Roskam, I., Aguiar, J., Akgun, E., et al. (2021). Parental burnout around the globe: A 42-country study. Affective Science, 2(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-020-00028-4
  12. Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.112
  13. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.

If you recognised yourself here

You don’t have to have it figured out to reach out. Tell me what you’re carrying, in your own words — for yourself, your family, or your team.

Write to me → Training for your team